• El Discurso Filosofico De La Modernidad Habermas Pdf Para
• El Discurso Filosofico De La Modernidad Habermas Pdf Online

This critique of French philosophy and the history of German philosophy is a tour de force that has the immediacy and accessibility of the lecture form and the excitement of an encounter across national cultural boundaries as Habermas takes up the challenge posed by the radical critique of reason in contemporary French postmodernism. The lectures on Georges Bataille, This critique of French philosophy and the history of German philosophy is a tour de force that has the immediacy and accessibility of the lecture form and the excitement of an encounter across national cultural boundaries as Habermas takes up the challenge posed by the radical critique of reason in contemporary French postmodernism. The lectures on Georges Bataille, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Cornelius Castoriadis are of particular note, since they are the first fruits of the recent cross-fertilization between French and German thought.Jurgen Habermas is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt. While his commitment to the Enlightenment project is indeed laudable, Habermas refuses to acknowledge the fact that Modernity's characteristic faith in the ineluctable progress of reason has been decisively refuted. Already, in his Theses on the Philosophy of History, Walter Benjamin exposed the ideology of Progress for what it had become: bankrupt and complicit with the ascendance of fascism. The horrors of the second World War were not the result of a regression into barbarism, but were rather While his commitment to the Enlightenment project is indeed laudable, Habermas refuses to acknowledge the fact that Modernity's characteristic faith in the ineluctable progress of reason has been decisively refuted.

Already, in his Theses on the Philosophy of History, Walter Benjamin exposed the ideology of Progress for what it had become: bankrupt and complicit with the ascendance of fascism. The horrors of the second World War were not the result of a regression into barbarism, but were rather the culmination and apotheosis of instrumental reason: genocide was committed systematically and efficiently by functionaries and technocrats (see: Eichmann, Adolf). Likewise, Hiroshima and the subsequent nuclear arms race are the irrational culmination of the progress of Reason: the potential self-annihilation of all life on earth, of reason itself. The project of Modernity ended with the horrors of Auschwitz and Hiroshima.This is not, however, to affirm the premature proclamations of 'postmodernity' and 'postmodernism' (Lyotard, Baudrillard, Jameson, etc). With regard to this, Habermas is rightly critical - but for the wrong reasons. The epoch into which the world has entered is only POST-modern: it is a period of transition, or one still wracked with growing pains.

Whatever the meaning of our age may be, we must await its maturation to recognize it for what it is.Nevertheless, this is not by any means to dismiss or denigrate Habermas' work, reactionary though his thought may well be. His hyper-critical and rather catty attitude toward his colleagues and contemporaries does rub me the wrong way. Very useful to get a handle on difficult concepts in Western philosophy such as the “dialectic of the Enlightenment”. In fairly quick-paced chapters, the book does an admirable job of explaining why various 20th-century approaches have been dead ends, including the genealogy of power (Foucault), the heroic projections of Dasein (Heidegger), deconstruction (Derrida), and negative dialectics (Horkheimer & Adorno).

Habermas is not as dismissive of Luhmann’s systems theory (1984), but Habermas Very useful to get a handle on difficult concepts in Western philosophy such as the “dialectic of the Enlightenment”. In fairly quick-paced chapters, the book does an admirable job of explaining why various 20th-century approaches have been dead ends, including the genealogy of power (Foucault), the heroic projections of Dasein (Heidegger), deconstruction (Derrida), and negative dialectics (Horkheimer & Adorno). Habermas is not as dismissive of Luhmann’s systems theory (1984), but Habermas is not very much impressed with systems theory either, as Luhmann reduces communication to just so much “noise in the system” and therefore, Luhmann leaves no space for reason, or validity claims, severely truncating the human endeavor, depriving it of its normative content. Luhmann is another antihumanist in a long line of counter-enlightenment thinking, a line of that goes back all the way to the early modernity of the 17th century. A masterful overview.For those unfamiliar with Habermas altogether, these twelve lectures are a far more fruitful place to begin than his later publications, such as the inordinately dense Beyond Facts and Norms (1992). I read this with a particular focus for my research, and so perhaps was not as attentive as I needed to be for many sections of the book, but this was a slog.

El Discurso Filosofico De La Modernidad Habermas Pdf Para

Habermas isn't particularly charitable to his subjects, and many of his own suggestions seem to be just more charitable renderings of those figures. Document db update document. (Not always, and it's important to show differences, but it was difficult to trust his renderings of other thinkers when some of the ones I was familiar with seemed treated I read this with a particular focus for my research, and so perhaps was not as attentive as I needed to be for many sections of the book, but this was a slog.

Habermas isn't particularly charitable to his subjects, and many of his own suggestions seem to be just more charitable renderings of those figures. (Not always, and it's important to show differences, but it was difficult to trust his renderings of other thinkers when some of the ones I was familiar with seemed treated poorly-particularly Derrida, Wittgenstein, and ordinary language philosophy.) Lecture XI is probably an important read for getting to know Habermas' thought, and if you want to see how he treats specific figures, you could read the relevant parts without reading the whole book. But I don't recommend reading those sections without some familiarity with the relevant subjects, because Habermas does not explain the technical terms very well, and it can be tough going unless you already know what's happening. I only read the first essay of this book, since I am concerned with Habermas' explanation of time in modernity. I am working on a paper about the uses of time in three film versions (one modernist, one postmodernist, and one relatively pre-modernist) of King Lear, and Habermas was one of the sources in David Harvey's The Condition of Postmodernity, which is a key text. So I figured I'd go to Habermas, though he wasn't as specific about the uses and conceptions of time as I had hoped he would be I only read the first essay of this book, since I am concerned with Habermas' explanation of time in modernity.

El Discurso Filosofico De La Modernidad Habermas Pdf Online

I am working on a paper about the uses of time in three film versions (one modernist, one postmodernist, and one relatively pre-modernist) of King Lear, and Habermas was one of the sources in David Harvey's The Condition of Postmodernity, which is a key text. So I figured I'd go to Habermas, though he wasn't as specific about the uses and conceptions of time as I had hoped he would be (in his defense, the book isn't primarily about time, but the first essay seemed relevant. I hope to have more luck with 'Modernity-An Unfinished Project.'